Given how these "conservative" prelates continue to be in the news, it's worth revisiting this article from 2019 by Bishop Sanborn:
"[Burke and Schneider] are trying to save the Vatican II religion and its heresy-promulgating hierarchy by diminishing the authority of the pope, and by suggesting that issuing “corrections” will suffice to ensure the indefectibility of the Catholic Church. These are very serious errors."
Read in full here:
https://inveritateblog.com/2019/12/15/burke-and-schneider-false-hopes/
Have you read this article? Also from 2019, written by Fr. Cekada (RIP):
The Errors of Athanasius Schneider
"It is obvious from the title that Bp. Schneider intends to squelch any tendencies among conservatives and neo-trads to consider the possibility that in Francis, they are faced with a heretic who therefore could not possibly be a true pope — to embrace sedevacantism, in other words.
To preclude this, Bp. Schneider will attempt to destroy pre-Vatican II teaching on both the special or binding nature of ordinary papal magisterium and on the automatic loss of office by a heretical pope. This way, conservative and neo-trad readers will feel free to ignore Bergoglio’s heresies, while still entertaining the consoling fantasy that a public heresy-spewer can still be “Peter.”"
Creative Fidelity: Burke & Schneider try to justify their “Loyal Opposition”
"Trying to reconcile the irreconcilable will always yield grotesque results, and this document is no different. The authors are attempting to reconcile the person of Francis with the Catholic doctrine on the Papacy, and that is going to be as successful as trying to force a square peg through a round hole. You may eventually be able to do it, but not without either damaging the peg or the hole. In other words, it can only be done by either distorting the record of what Francis believes and teaches, or by distorting the Catholic teaching on the Papacy. At least one of the two will always be a casualty." - Novus Ordo Watch
See more articles refuting Schneider.
